Friday, August 20, 2010

Tipizate formulate de federatie / pregatire, parametrii cantitativi

aici este redat Ciclul 1 de pregatire; tipizatul se repeta aidoma pt restul ciclurilor (3 la numar/an)
[cele 2 tipizate pot fi marite daca se 'da' click stanga]

.. pentru intelegerea deplina a structurii pregatirii..., "Cartea federatiei" la pag.224 expune, pe larg, termenii si interpretarea lor.

Eu obiectez ca 'cartea' ar putea fi adusa la zi... (a) si ca textul selectat de mine ar fi trebuit sa inceapa cu dezbaterea relatie 'tehnica corecta' (cerinta unica in atatea alte sporturi...) si accesarea 'Factorului Psy' / in opozitie cu ipostaza 'Macelar' (becali in italiana)(b),

iata, din editia revazuta a d.lui Ernest Maglicho o expunere care ar putea da curaj la a mai 'schimba' ceva [
cu rf. la faptul ca, probabil, federatia a comandat specialistilor de la insitutul ns. de cercetare EFS
aceasta lucrare, sau numai aprtea care se refera la linia metodica a pregatirii, specialsitii au apelat la lucrarea de referinta a d.lui E.M. si au acordat-o la cerintele de acum cca 10 ani; intre timp autorul a refacut partial unele abordari care , din pacate, nu au ajuns la indemana antrenorilor, evident printr-o noua editie a 'cartii'
]

iata ce reface dl. E.M.:

-->
with permission from Human Kinetics Publishers
Stroke Counting Drills*


One of the most common drills for increasing stroke lengths is to count strokes for one pool length and repeat the drill while attempting to cover the distance with fewer strokes. All of this is done at a slow speed. This is a good drill for young and inexperienced age-group swimmers. The efficiency of their strokes and their performances will improve when they attempt to cover each pool length with fewer strokes, regardless of the speed of their swims.

Although a drill like the one just described is excellent for inexperienced swimmers, it has limited value once athletes can swim with good coordination and reasonable efficiency. At that point, swimming speeds and stroke rates must be included in drills designed to increase stroke length. Because the relationship between the combination of stroke rate and stroke length that will produce the most efficient swimming velocity will be different for each race distance and for each swimmer, all three elements should be included in drills to improve stroke lengths. Following are some drills that include all three elements.

SWOLF
This drill is so named because it involves swimming and is scored like golf. The value of the drill is that it allows each swimmer to discover the best way to improve the relationship between stroke length and stroke rate to achieve a particular swimming velocity, whether through increasing stroke length, increasing stroke rate, or using some combination of the two. The drill is performed in the following manner. The athletes swim a particular repeat distance, 25 or 50 yd or m, while counting their strokes. Their times are noted, and the two measures, number of strokes and their time for the swim, are combined for a score. For example, a time of 30.00 for 50 m with a stroke count of 40 would produce a score of 70.

Once they have established a base score, swimmers can use any one of several variations of the game to improve the relationship between their stroke rates and stroke lengths. The goal is to reduce the score by (1) swimming faster with fewer strokes, (2) swimming faster with little or no increase in the number of strokes taken, or (3) swimming the same time or nearly so with fewer strokes. If the swimmer in the previous example were to swim 29.00 with the same stroke count, the score would be an improved 69. This swimmer’s stroke rate has undoubtedly increased with little or no loss of stroke length, which accounts for the improved time. Similarly, the same time of 30.00 coupled with a reduced stroke count of 38 would produce an improved score of 68. In that case, the swimmer’s stroke length will have improved and the stroke rate will have decreased with no detrimental effect on swimming speed.

The results will be more difficult to evaluate when lower scores result from faster times that are coupled with a greater number of strokes. This is generally a desirable effect because the lower score results from time reductions that are proportionally greater than the amount by which stroke lengths have declined. This effect can certainly be considered beneficial for improving sprint speed. Increases of stroke rates and the reduction of stroke lengths may not be advantageous for longer sprints, middle distance races, and distance events if the perceived effort that produced lower scores is beyond that which swimmers feel they could sustain over their race distance.

KICK-INS
The kick-in drill works best for increasing stroke length. To perform it, athletes swim a series of 50 or 100 repeats while counting the number of stroke cycles required to complete each repeat. Before starting, each swimmer should be assigned the maximum number of cycles they are permitted to use for the repeat distance in the allotted time. That number should be one or two cycles fewer than they generally need to complete that distance. The goal, then, is to complete the repeats with fewer strokes. If they do not finish the repeat when they have completed their assigned number of stroke cycles, they must kick the remaining distance to the finish. The send-off time for the repeats should be set so it is challenging but manageable if the swimmers can complete the repeats without kicking in. The time goal will motivate swimmers to try to reduce their strokes without sacrificing swimming speed. This drill puts a premium on increasing stroke length and doing so without increasing the energy cost of the swim.

STROKE COUNTING AT SPRINT SPEED
This drill can help sprinters increase their stroke lengths while swimming at race speed. The drill can be done in a number of ways. With one method, swimmers sprint 25 yd or m at maximum speed while trying to reduce their stroke count. This method puts a premium on swimming fast with a longer stroke length. Another method is to try to swim each repeat faster without increasing the stroke count. This encourages them to increase their stroke rates without shortening their stroke lengths. The distance that swimmers cover with a push-off can become a confounding variable with both drills. Therefore, swimmers should try to keep that distance similar from swim to swim. The influence of the push-off for different distances can be eliminated from this drill by counting only the number of strokes required to get from one set of flags to the next.

Still another method for increasing stroke length at sprint speed is for the athletes to swim only a specified number of stroke cycles while trying to cover more distance with each swim. For example, the coach can measure the distance a swimmer can cover with two or three stroke cycles, and then the swimmer can try to increase that distance. This distance should be measured in the middle of the pool to remove the influence of the push-off.

Adaugand si experienta de ultima ora a celui care a colectionat 16 medalii olimpice si 49 de titluri de campion al USA - M. Phelps, dar mai ales a antrenorului acestuia Bob Bowman se poate usor deduce ca intregul proces de pregatire a lasat bine in urma conceptele tip 'macelar' si se axeaza pe unele abordari noi, mai ales in ceea ce priveste eficienta.

iata, tradus, ce expune Bob Bowman cu referire la acest controversat subiect:"
-->
pentru amanunte -click aici
Ce spune Bowman in clipul ds. antrenamentul lui M.Phelps, la cap. 'eficienta':

"Exercitiile de vaslire si timp sunt un mod excelent prin care inotatorul poate sa isi gestioneze lungimea vaslirii, si sa inoate la cel mai inalt nivel de eficienta[cu referire la numararea vaslirilor si a secundelor...!]. Exercitiul nostru pentru delfin presupune inotarea distantei de 50 m si numararea vaslirilor; la sfarsit se compara timpul cu numarul de vasliri - si scopul este de a avea numarul vaslirilor cu 10 unitati mai mic decat timpul in secunde: daca inotatorului inoata distanta in 30 de secunde, numarul de vasliri ar trebui sa fie 20."
Michael Phelps a realizat atunci, la antrenament: 18 vasliri - 28.2 secunde
Obs .lui M.Olaru – 13 martie 2009:
Rezulta clar ca eficienta tehnica ii preocupa mult pe americani si de aici incepe performanta ( + multe alte ‘ingrediente’) dar fara tehnica..., de fapt stiti prea bine ce inseamna sa n-ai tehnica...
Cu referire la 'BEST-ul meu', el este maniera de a calcula matematic si fara aprecieri subiective, la intamplare – care este valoarea eficientei unui inotator... nu in comparatie cu altii ... ci in primul rand in comparatie cu ce poate 'el' la un moment dat ...., mai este ceva - 'BEST-ul meu', practicat cu grija in decursul antrenamentelor conduce la perfectionarea desavarsita a tehnicii, ceea ce nu este un lucru de ici de colo... OK ?!
Dar cu antrenori superficiali si incapatanati ca unii dintre voi.... 'sa mai si numeri bratele' ... este prea de tot...; dar iata ca, in 2009, specialistii englezi au realizat si acest accesoriu (Pool-Mate) sub forma unui ceas cu mai multe functiuni, deci si cel mai important – inregistrarea ciclurilor de vaslire care va ‘numara’ el, ceasul, vaslirile in locul vostru...
Nu mai repet ca deja exista un sistem duplex (www.polar.fi / receptor la ceas, emitator atastat la piept) care calculeaza in regim waterproff:
consumul caloric / in timpul efortului,
frecventa cardiaca,
cea respiratoare
in functie de varsta, talie, greutate si sex ;
Sistemul este produs de firma finlandeza – vezi www. polar. fi.si are un pret atragator (cca 100 euro) + poate fi cumparat si din Ungaria !

2018.... intre timp au mai aparut noi accesorii: POLMATE in UK si FINIS in USA

Thursday, August 19, 2010

"Ceva" se schimba in presa ns. ....?

Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 4:56:10 PM
Subject:
"Ceva" se schimba in presa ns. ....?




Ziarul ADEVARUL ne face un cadou-surpriza : renunta la agasanta batalie pentru 'putere' si face loc unei alte batalii - pt. cultura si pt. sentimente autentice romanesti.

Vreau sa-l felicit pe dl. Paul R., care, iata, a reusit sa treaca de 'cenzura politikyei' si sa ne ofere acest minunat reportaj pe 2 pagini, caz unic dupa '89.

Cu felicitarile mele si ale colegilor..., sa mergeti 'drept' si numai 'inainte'

m.o.
il rog pe dl. Paul Rogojinaru sa ia legatura cu prof. univ. Postolache Nicolae/ USHB, specialist in Istoria EFS !
Bucuresti, Romania ++40722476223
www.gunselgunsel.com/mircea.olaru.htm
http://despre-inot.blogspot.com/ = noua adresa a blogului


[daca doriti marirea imaginilor - faceti clik stanga ....]






WORLD-CLASS SUPPORT FOR COACHES

-->
WORLD-CLASS SUPPORT FOR COACHES
USA Swimming is your source to become a certified coach member of USA Swimming. But more than that, USA Swimming offers coaching clinics, consultant services and a vast array of resources. You are poolside every day, building America’s Swim Team from the ground up. Let USA Swimming be your support staff as you run your club and coach your athletes. Let USA Swimming help you build champions.
RESOURCES FOR COACHING SUCCESS
As a coach you are a guide, an inspiration, a mentor and a role model. You have a passion for the sport of swimming and for coaching athletes. With all of these roles, you may sometimes find that you need some help and guidance.
As the governing body for the sport, USA Swimming provides you and your swimmers with a variety of opportunities and resources. Interact in person or online with other coaches, consult articles on nutrition, fitness and workout regimens. USA Swimming is here to help you be the best coach you can be.
LOOKING TO BECOME A COACH OR RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP?

LOOKING TO BECOME A COACH OR RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP?

To become a registered USA Swimming coach member, the coach must complete safety, education and background screening requirements. Upon completion of these requirments, the coach registers through the appropriate LSC Registration/Membership Chairperson. Please carefully read through ALL three requirement sections below.
If you are registering as a coach for the first time, check out the New Coach Information link at the bottom of the page for complete information on the requirements to become a coach member with USA Swimming.
COACH SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

COACH SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

Effective since 1988, all coach members are required to fulfill safety training requirements as established by the USA Swimming Board of Directors. USA Swimming currently requires coach members to hold current certifications for the following: Safety Training for Swim Coaches, CPR, and First Aid.
Local Swimming Committees (LSCs) enforce these requirements largely through the membership function. Justification for the requirements may be found in legislation passed over the years by the USA Swimming House of Delegates. The following passages are found in the 2007 Rules and Regulations:
  • Article 202.3.3 “….all persons acting in any coaching capacity in a sanctioned event must be coach members of USA Swimming, Inc.”
  • Article 502.4.3 “All coaches of USA Swimming clubs, including seasonal clubs, shall join USA Swimming as coach members and shall satisfactorily complete safety training and background screening required by USA Swimming.”
A list of acceptable First Aid, CPR and STSC courses is below. Taking courses that are not on this list will not be acceptable for coach membership.
Be sure to keep your certifications up to date. From an insurance standpoint, you are no longer insured as a coach as of the date that any of your certifications expire. You are immediately considered a non-athlete
===================================
selectat articol:
Mircea Olaru, ph.ed.
antrenor de Inot
40722 476 223
021.2222185 + robot
www.gunselgunsel.com/mircea.olaru.htm

2008 – ’’Despre noul concept BEST’’ – EFS-USH
2007 – ’Despre Inot .... cu Mircea Olaru’,CD, SSEurop.
1999 – A 8-a Conf Nat. Stiinta sportului, Referat-BEST
1995 – 4 Postere color cu Tehnica de inot sportiv FRN
1992 – Curs de Inot, Univ. Ecologica. Buc/C.Turcas,
1991 – Note de curs – Inot, Univ. Ecologica /C.Turcas,
1989 – Evolutia Rec Mond. Rev. EFS/ Nr. 1 - 9
1988 – Evolutia Rec. Mond. Rev EFS/Nr. 7 – 12
1988 – Sa nu ne temem de apa, Ed.Sport-Turism,
1988 – Bazinul din Bacau …, Rev. EFS / 5
1987 - Ierarhizarea prestatiilor la inot, Rev. EFS/2
1986 – Climb to the top, D.Pursley-traducere, FRN.
1985 - Aparate ajutatoare, Rev. EFS/6,7
1984 – Ghidul instructorului de inot, FRN,
1983 – FRN-Schimb de exp- URSS. Armenia, DDR
1983 – Testarea Eficientei Biomecanice la Inot’/BEST,
1982 – Manualul – INOT - Ed.Sport-Turism,
1981 – O noua metoda de invatare, Rev. EFS/12
1981 – ‚Nu stie nici sa inoate …’, rev.EFS/1,2,3
1978 – Invatarea inotului, Rev. EFS/4,5,6,7
1973 – Despre selectia la inot, rev. EFS/7
1972 – ’’O lectie uitata din programa scolara’’,
1970 - ‘Lectii de inot’, colab. Eugenia Magda,
1970 – Pliantul ‘Invatarea inotului’ , CNEFS
1965 – Primii pasi spre performanta, Rev.EFS/2
amanunte click - aici

"NU mai lasa pe altii sa-ti poarte gandurile...."

.. un site dedicat sportului comenteaza in stil cam ciudat situatia inotatoarei nr. 1 a tarii noastre Camelia Potec.
Eu nu sunt de acord ca viata sportiva a Cameliei sa fie subject de 'gazeta de perete' asa ca titlul ales pt acest reportaj trebuie bagat in seama


amanunte - aici

http://www.prosport.ro/alte-sporturi/alte-sporturi/potec-se-retrage-azi-spun-nu-6933328?cp=2#cFormTop,




http://www.prosport.ro/alte-sporturi/alte-sporturi/potec-se-retrage-azi-spun-nu-6933328?cp=2#cFormTop,


Diaspora ns. tot cu gandul acasa, dar la 'casa' cea noua ....

Fw: cintec pop transformat in stil Vangelis ....
Bucuresti, Romania ++40722476223
www.gunselgunsel.com/mircea.olaru.htm
http://despre-inot.blogspot.com/ = noua adresa a blogului




----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Frunza
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 1:50:33 AM
Subject: cintec pop transformat in stil Vangelis

Justin Bieber: U Smile.

Versiunea originala - aici:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlYEntYv6DM

Remixata prin programul Paulstretch....foarte meditativa:

http://soundcloud.com/shamantis/j-biebz-u-smile-800-slower

PS Programul este scris de un roman din Tg. Mures.

Dan

este o postare si pentru Mircea Hohoiu....; oare a ajuns cu bine acasa din Malaesya..?

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

CES Buda-Pesta, analize, info. 02

Am incercat sa gasesc o lista, simpla, cu recordurile realizate la aceste campionate...; atat cat ma mai pricep... nu am gasit-o !
Sa fie din cauza ca nu s-au facut recorduri..? Mirama-s... ; in schimb am gasit o foarte sugestiva statistica, elocventa ! Speram ca 'scoala germana', care s-a afirmat din CM Roma 2009, sa fie iarasi lansata... nu este asa...; oare dece...?


Interviu cu dl. Cornel Marculescu - vedeti aici.
Pentru noi romanii, prezenta d.lui C. M. in bordul FINA este o mare bucurie si supriza; este cert ca D-sa nu poate sa faca niste 'scamatorii' si inotatorii nostrii sa devina, magic, campioni mondiali, in serie...; dar, este cert de intuit ca - daca oamenii nostri care conduc inotul ar avea nevoie de un ajutor (unul legal si pt. toata lumea=clinici de formare antrenori, schimburi de experienta, etc.) Cornel nu s-ar da in laturi in a ne ajuta. Problema e ca : 'no body answer him' si deci 'dragoste cu forta' nu se poa'....., asta-i parerea mea...!
"think about', dears colleagues...

The World Champion vs. the best European

This material presents the difference between the World Champion and the best European swimmer in the category concerned. As in the case of world records (see page 8-9), here the difference is greater – bigger than 2% – in events where Michael Phelps won.
Here are six events from both genders where the difference is the greatest.

Men
100m fly
Difference: 1.46 2.79%
1. PHELPS Michael USA 50.77
5. SERDINOV Andriy UKR 52.23
200m fly
Difference: 3.13 2.71%
1. PHELPS Michael USA 1:52.09
3. SKVORTSOV Nikolay RUS 1:55.22
200m free
Difference: 2.42 2.27%
1. PHELPS Michael USA 1:43.86
2. V. D HOOGENBAND NED 1:46.28
4x200m free
Difference: 8.04 1.86%
1. United States 7:03.24
4. Great Britain 7:11.28
200m IM
Difference: 1.94 1.65%
1. PHELPS Michael USA 1:54.98
3. CSEH Laszlo ITA 1:56.92
50m fly
Difference: 0.38 1.61%
1. SCHOEMAN Roland RSA 23.18
3. ANDKJAER J. Sch. DEN 23.56

Women

200m IM
Difference: 3.92 2.92%
1. HOFF Kathryn USA 2:10.13
5. HJORTH-HANSEN J. DEN 2:14.05
200m breast
Difference: 4.10 2.80%
1. JONES Leisel AUS 2:21.84
2. BALFOUR Kirsty GBR 2:25.94
4x100m medley
Difference: 6.44 2.65%
1. Australia 3:55.74
2. Great Britain 4:02.18
400m IM
Difference: 7.25 2.58%
1. HOFF Katie USA 4:32.89
2. MARTYNOVA Yana RUS 4:40.14
100m breast
Difference: 1.55 2.30%
1. JONES Leisel AUS 1:05.72
3. KHLISTUNOVA Anna UKR 1:07.27
50m breast
Difference: 0.72 2.29%
1. HARDY Jessica USA 30.63
5. SCHAFER Janne GER 31.35


Melbourne marked a seachange in swimming, one that heralded a movement described by some head coaches as the new fifth stroke.

mai multe amanunte - click aici

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

>> descopera.ro > ....

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: dede
To: dan
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 2:52:12 PM
Subject: dede iti recomanda o stire de pe Descopera.ro

MediaPro

Salut dan,
dede iti recomanda stirea:


===============================================

inca unu...,aveti grije... de vreti sa deveniti 'campion':
Bucuresti, Romania ++40722476223
www.gunselgunsel.com/mircea.olaru.htm
http://despre-inot.blogspot.com/ = noua adresa a blogului




----- Forwarded Message ----
From: dede
To: dan
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 2:53:16 PM
Subject: dede iti recomanda o stire de pe Descopera.ro